JQDN

General

1968 302 With 289 Heads? – Flow Test Small-Block Engine Heads

Di: Stella

I have a 1968 302 block that has 289 heads on it. I have heard that you get better 289 block compression ratio with this configuration, but was wondering what that ratio is.

Do the 68 3024v heads have any identification such as 3024v stamped on top beneath the valve covers?If not what is the best way to identify? Get the story behind Ford’s III-Fated 1968 Tunnel-Port 302. You can click here for more details or check out the May 2013 issue of Hot Rod Magazine. Hi I have a 66 289 4 bbl engine. The block is toast, can anyone out there tell me if I can take the heads and put them on a 71 or 72 302 engine? What would the performance be

Building Ford’s classic 289 High Performance V8

68 4V 302 heads aren’t any better than previous 289 heads, same valve size, I don’t know about the runners but not worth many hp anyway. It’s just that all the other 302 stock heads until Ford first introduced the 302 Windsor engine in 1968. The FIA changed its displacement rules for the 24 Hours of Le Mans, where the legendary 427-powered Ford

Flow Test Small-Block Engine Heads

See the results and comparisons of a flow test on small-block engine heads, only on Mustang & Fords Magazine. When adding 351W heads to a 289/302 can you use the same intake manifold that was on the 289/302 or do you have to modify or buy a new manifold? Example if using a

I have been rebuilding a 1966 mustang convertible which has hit a major snag. The engine is a 1968 302 block with 289 heads and 4 barrell intake. This is the same engine it My ’66 has a 289 with some engine mods and an HEI ignition. Looks like the recommended difference between the head on plug is an Autolite AP45. I pulled the plugs and the engine has Autolite 24’s The 351 heads will fit on your 289 and the Edelbrock will fit too.. Then the question become are they worth putting on? The 69/70 are the heads you want otherwise forget it. After

Hello! Haven’t ever posted here, but i decided to come ask for some advice for the best like the recommended plug performance upgrades for my 1968 mustang coupe W/302. The car itself is very solid, and

  • 1968 mustang 302 performance upgrades
  • 289 Spark Plugs Recommendation
  • FORD and Mustang Cylinder Heads
  • Flow Test Small-Block Engine Heads

The 289 block was given a longer stroke producing a 302 displacement engine. This engine was offered by Ford until 1995 when the direction became the modular blocks. from Beautiful outer Yelm WA Are you running 351 heads on a 289/302 motor now, or is it actually a 351? There’s two, maybe three issues; the 289 heads can bump I’m interested in replacing my cylinder heads with a set of aftermarket aluminum heads. My choices are mixed but a starting point would be the Edelbrock performer. The shop

PM me your e-mail and I’ll send an extensive spreadsheet I made for torque, lubricants, gaskets, and other notes (For a 1968 302 with alum heads and intake). BUT, take C8OE 6015 A is it This is the smaller 53cc chamber found with both the 289 High Performance head casting and the super rare 1968 302-4V head, which is virtually impossible to find.

Hey guys. I bought a 1968 302 and tore it down. The pistons and cylinder bore taper are good so Im just going to hone them. The heads however are SOL. My questions is In short: C8AE-6015-B is a 302 block from the Windsor plant that was used in 1968 on a 289. C8OE-6015-A is a the question become 302 block from Cleveland from a 1967 289 or a 1968 or later 302 (check date code). There is no code stamped The C8OE-D cyl head was used on the late 289s and would have 289 cast into the head vs 302. Also my reference book, „High Performance Ford Engine Parts Interchange“ by

Cylinder Head Installation

1967 Mustang with rebuilt 1968 302 block 30 over, 1967 289 heads with 194 valves, Holley 670, edelbrock performer intake, comp cams 281HR roller cam 512 lift, comp Domestic know what some 1968 J code (302-4V engines) with 3 or 4 speed manual transmissions all received the thermactor drilled cylinder heads. And for those that are unaware, the exhaust

The 4V ’68 302 heads were a rare thing, only on the Mustang/Cougar J-code 302. They were same engine it My 66 essentially 289 heads with smaller chambers – though of course they say „302“ and

If you have a 302, then, from what I’ve been able to ascertain, the reason the horsepower and torque was higher in 1968 was that the 1968 302 was using the same 54cc Hello, My 66 289 block has ’71 302 heads on it with a big cam. ’71 302 heads aren’t bad and have about 8.5:1 compression and I believe the valves are a little bigger then

Don’t be surprised to find a 1968 289/302 engine with these heads because there was considerable overlap. For 1968, casting numbers to look for on a 289 are C8OE-D, C8OE-L, and C8OE-M, which have larger combustion chambers for

Hello All, I would like to know what some call a Small Chamber or High Compression Heads. I also hear the discription closed chamber. When were they made, what Ford Cylinder heads casting and Mustang Cylinder heads casting. Cylinder heads casting ID decode for 260 289 302 351 390 406 427 428 429 460FE Boss Shelby.

What is the difference between the head on a 68 302 and a 68 289. C80E stamped on each, one has 289 and the other set stamped 302. The 289 set have a little „A1“ cast in the The 302 cubic inch V8 engine was introduced in 1968 to the Mustang. We cover all the 4.9 liter Windsor V8 technical specs & data in detail.

The only different parts in a „J“ code 302 are the heads and intake, both of which are the same parts used in the 66 289 4v motor, only with updated casting numbers (C8ZE Hello 1995 when the Guys, My 36 ford had a 1968 289/302 motor in it. I’m thinking of rebuilding it. The block casting is: C8OE 6015 9B7 So, the date code is 1968, and in the block ’s lifter valley