JQDN

General

Organizational Learning: A Review Of Some Literatures.

Di: Stella

Under this scenario, the purpose of this document is to identify the relationship between organizational learning and performance, through a systematic review of the literature where selection and

Organizational Routines: A Literature Review

Organizational learning is currently the focus of considerable attention, and it is addressed by a broad range of literatures. Organization learning is also theory, industrial econ omics, economic history, and business, management and innovation studies all approach the question of

The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences Organizational learning: a review of some literatures Cannibals With Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business Environmental policy and technological change: towards deliberative governance Innovation-Oriented Environmental Regulation: Theoretical Approaches and

Organizational Learning: Mechanisms, Culture, and Feasibility

This conceptual article focuses on organizational learning (OL), which is broadly defined as a learning process within organizations that involves the interaction of individual and collective (group, organizational, and inter-organizational) levels of analysis and leads to achieving organizations’ goals. This article explores a largely uncharted route of looking at OL Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational Learning A Review of Some Literature. Organization Studies, 14, 375-394.

Organizational learning is currently the focus of considerable attention, and it is addressed by a broad range of literatures. Organization theory, industrial econ omics, economic history, and business, management and innovation studies all approach the question of how organizations learn. A number of branches of psychology are also revealing on the issue. This This conceptual paper reviewed some extant literatures on organisational learning and learning organisations with a view to answering the following question: First, how do you identify a learning organisation when you see one? Secondly, what is the conceptual difference between organisational learning and learning organisation? Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures. Organization Studies, 14 (3), 375–394. doi:10.1177/017084069301400303

Organizational learning is currently the focus of considerable attention, and it is addressed by a broad range of literatures. Organization theory, industrial econ omics, economic history, and business, management and innovation studies all approach the question of how organizations learn. A number

E-Learning systems are receiving ever increasing attention in, academia, businesses as well as in public administrations. Managers and employee who need efficient forms of training as well as learning flow within the organization, do not have to gather in a place at Organisational Learning (OL) is paper reviews essential for the survival of an organisation and has led to a significant amount of conceptual and empirical studies. However, no attempt has yet been made to track the overall evolution of OL literature along with the inter-related concepts of learning organisation and organisational learning

“Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures”, Organization Studies, 14,3: 375-394, 1993. “Technology-Based SMEs: Their Role in Industrial and Economic Change”, R. Rothwell and M. Dodgson, International Journal of Technology Management. The literature on organizational learning can be classified into five areas: information acquisition, information distribution and interpretation, making meaning, organizational memory, and information retrieval. Each has special implications for the role of

(PDF) CONCEPT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR (OCB): A ...

Abstract Organizational learning (OL) enables organizations to transform individual knowledge into organizational knowledge. Organizations struggle to implement practical approaches due to the lack of concrete prescriptions. We performed a literature review to OL theories identify OL approaches and linked these approaches to OL theories. We synthesized 18 OL approaches across three Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures. Organization Studies, 14 (3), 375–394. doi:10.1177/017084069301400303

The field of organizational learning can be considered in several perspectives and dimensions. The aim of the study is to evaluate the salient aspects of the field while exploring the different perspectives and approaches of organizational learning namely individual/cognitive, objective, technical, social, cultural, humanistic, and political. Organizational learning is also seen as a process of detecting and correcting errors, where enterprises at the system learn through individuals who act as agents. Members learn by doing, and such learning process could be inhibited or facilitated by entities’ ecological learning system. This paper reviews the literature on organizational learning. Organizational learning is viewed as routine-based, history-dependent, and target-oriented. Organizations are seen as learning by encoding inferences from history into routines that guide behavior.

This article concerns the first phase of a project introducing organizational learning into the Ordnance Corps of the Israel Defense Forces. Conducted as a joint experiment, the project was guided by a set of principles and metaphors that constituted a vision of learning organizations. The article describes the conceptual rationale underlying the project, difficulties encountered A number of reasons can be suggested why the study of organizational learning is currently so fashionable. First, the concept of the ‚learning organization‘ is gaining currency amongst large organizations as they attempt to develop structures and systems which are more adaptable and responsive to change. This development has been described and influenced by Organizational learning is currently the focus of considerable attention, and it is addressed by a broad range of literatures. Organization theory, industrial economics, economic history, and business, management and innovation studies all approach the question of

Learning by organizations. – Cheltenham [u.a.] : Elgar, ISBN 978-1-84720-462-2. – 2008, p. 33-52 Subject: Organisation | Organization | Lernprozess | Learning process Consequently, although the chapter develops a comprehensive review of organizational learning, it focuses our analysis on the process perspective of this line of literature, especially the approach that suggests the use of a stage model for the description and explanation of change within organizations. Prior reviews of organizational learning (OL) have noted an exponential growth in the literature through the 1990s and have expressed concerns about the lack of empirical research. In this paper, we review the literature published during the period 1990-2002 and take stock of the state of empirical research in OL. Based on the 123 articles reviewed, we note a phenomenal growth

The publication of Senge’s book on learning organizations (Senge, 1990) as well as the revised publication in 1996 of Argyris and Schön’s work from 1978 on organizational learning, is further evidence of an interest in applying the term ‘learning’ as a lens through which to view organizational life and work (Argyris & Schön, 1978, 1996). While some academics maintain that organizational learning is seen as learning by simply the sum of what individuals in organizations learn (Kim, 1993; Simon 1991), others contend that organizational learning is a Organizational learning is currently the focus of considerable attention, and it is addressed by a broad range of literatures. Organization theory, industrial economics, economic history, and business, management and innovation studies all approach the question of

Download: Cites: Information Journal Paper Title ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: A REVIEW OF SOME LITERATURES Author (s) DODGESON M. | Issue Writer Certificate Keywords Not Registered. This article presents a two-faceted (structural and cultural) approach to organizational learning. The structural facet focuses on organizational learning mechanisms, which are institutionalized structural and procedural arrangements allowing organizations to systematically collect, analyze, evolution of OL store, disseminate, and use information that is relevant to the performance of the organization. Abstract Organizational learning is currently the focus of considerable attention, and it is addressed by a broad range of literatures. Organization theory, industrial econ omics, economic history, and business, management and innovation studies all approach the question of how organizations learn. A number of branches of psychology are also revealing on the issue.

Organizational learning refers to learning at the system rather than individual level. The changing nature of work, global competitive challenges, and everpresent change require that human resource professionals focus on this higher level of learning. The literature on organizational learning can be classijied into five areas: information acquisition, injormation distribution and About Google Books – Privacy Policy – Terms of Service – Information for Publishers – Report an issue – Help – Google Home

ABSTRACT While a comprehensive model for organizational learning (OL) remains elusory, the wide web of scholarly conversation and debate has spurred rich insight into the central questions of how and what people learn in organizational settings. This paper is aimed at exploring some of those debates, with a view to identifying a complementary set of factors that, if present, might